Arts & Culture
Arts & Culture

Matteo Garrone's acclaimed "Gomorrah" is like no other organized crime movie you've seen
ShareItalian film director Paolo Sorrentino, in an interview with the British newspaper The Guardian, criticized Francis Coppola and Martin Scorsese for having “mythologized organized crime.” The two American auteurs “fell in love with mafiosi,” Sorrentino declared.
No one can say that about Matteo Garrone and his film Gomorra. Adapted from the acclaimed book of the same name by the courageous investigative journalist Roberto Saviano, Gomorra depicts Neapolitan organized crime as an all-enveloping and monstrous system of corruption and pitiless violence, a modern circle of Hell.
There are no larger than life Sicilian patriarchs in Gomorra, no “I make you laugh?” killer clowns, no Prozac-popping suburbanites. There are, in fact, none of the character types familiar from decades of
From its opening sequence of a massacre in a tanning salon to its final image of human lives literally reduced to garbage, Gomorra offers no solace or hope. No heroic reformers stand up to the mob, and the police always arrive too late, when the corpses already lie on the pavement oozing blood. Within this hellish universe there are decent and honorable individuals, but they are trapped by the system run by the violent and corrupt.
In the world of the camorristi, the cash nexus is everything; it determines and defines all human relationships. Family, friendship, faith, love – all are irrelevant to the making of money. The single-minded pursuit of profit makes lethal enemies of life-long friends, turns children into murderers, and contaminates the physical environment. The spirits of Marx and Brecht, not Coppola, Scorsese, or Chase, hover over Gomorra.
The film focuses on several of the camorra’s key profit centers – drugs, toxic waste disposal, and the fashion industry. These by no means constitute the entirety of camorra business. The clans also have their hands in tourism, arms dealing, the building trades, textiles, transport, food distribution, supermarkets, restaurants, banks, and cinemas. To depict all this activity, which is described in Saviano’s book, would have required a mini-series, like HBO’s recently departed The Wire. But highlighting drugs, toxic waste and fashion is sufficient to show the long reach of the camorra, how it operates on local, national, and international levels, from the squalid housing projects of Scampia to corporate offices in
Five storylines, linked only by the fact that they all unfold within the camorra’s orbit, limn the terrain of this urban inferno. The characters are portrayed by a mix of established actors, including the fine Toni Servillo, star of Paolo Sorrentino’s un-romanticized 2005 Mafia movie The Consequences of Love, and non-professionals, with many of the latter recruited from working class neighborhoods dominated by the camorra.
| Scenes from Gomorrah |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Marco and Ciro, two gun-happy teenagers, think they’re living in Brian De Palma’s Scarface, as they quote lines of dialogue (“the world is ours!”) and act out scenes from the movie. Fearless but extremely foolhardy, they antagonize a local mob boss, first by stealing cocaine from his dealers and later by poaching a cache of high-tech weapons.
Totò, a quiet 13 year-old living in the Scampia projects, graduates from delivering groceries to a neighbor to delivering drugs. His involvement with the drug gang forces him to make a terrible and irrevocable choice that ensures his (temporary) survival and another’s death.
Don Ciro, middle-aged and nondescript, delivers cash to the families of imprisoned camorristi. The family members insult and berate him because the payments are never enough, but he remains impassive – until a war between rival clans shatters his composure and forces him to fight for his own survival.
Roberto, an unemployed thirty-year-old, gets a job working for Franco (Toni Servillo), a corporate camorrista who has gotten rich by dumping the toxic waste of Northern Italian firms in the once-pristine
Pasquale is a talented tailor working for, or rather, exploited by, the mobbed-up owner of a black market sweatshop. A Chinese factory owner offers to pay him handsomely to teach his trade to the Chinese’s workers. For the first time in his working life Pasquale is well-compensated and treated respectfully – the Chinese call him “maestro” – but the camorra intervenes to put an end to his moonlighting.
Garrone’s multi-strand tale never descends to hokey contrivance or sentimentality, unlike Crash, the inexplicably acclaimed 2005 Paul Haggis film. In Gomorra the disparate characters live in the same world, but there are no epiphanies of mutual understanding, no affirmations of shared humanity. There is only the war of all against all.
Gomorra is set in Naples and its environs, but the film doesn’t condemn only that ancient and long-suffering city. By making explicit the symbiotic relationships between Campanian criminals and “legitimate” businesses in the north and center, Gomorra indicts not only
The film’s closing credits provide additional particulars for the indictment. Organized crime, which generates 150 billion euros per year, is
Gomorra is a powerful and disturbing film that deserves the universal acclaim it has received. The Grand Prix winner at the 2008 Cannes Film Festival, it is
No one way to make a mob movie
I certainly didn't mean to suggest, and I don't think I did, that Garrone's approach is the only or optimal one a filmmaker should take in portraying organized crime. Italin filmmakers in particular have tackled this subject in a variety of styles and tonal registers, from neorealistic to heightened realism to comedy and satire to documentary-like realism. I was simply pointing out the singularity of Garrone's approach and how it radically differs from the celebrated depictions of Coppola, Scorsese, and Chase. I think that given his source material, a nonfiction journalistic expose of Naples' criminal syndicates, he did make the right choice. However, another film I cited,and that I admire, Sorrentino's Le Conseguenze dell'amore, is quite different, focusing as it does on the protagnonist's subjectivity, his existential aloneness and his one act of resistance against his mob bosses. There's no one right or wrong way to make a film about organized crime. And Sorrentino, in his comments on Coppola and Scorsese, did say he thinks their films are great portraits, even if they tend to make criminals larger than life and even sympathetic figures. But Garrone was not making a film centered on a compelling protagonist or a ":family." His aim was to depict the socioeconomic milieu of the camorra, and I think he succeeded.
--GdS
I agree
Yes! Of course! I did not mean to “pigeonhole”, so to speak, you or Italian filmmakers in a homogeneous theme category. As so many Italian Americans, I struggle with the whole mafia thing in literature, film, and reality. I had a couple of things in i-Italy that explores this ambiguousness about mafia films. I just meant to posit a voice in what I see as an ongoing dialogue in our community since the Godfather movie, lo so many years ago. As to your point about the range of film types that Italian filmmakers have used to explore the mafia, I recently had the opportunity to see a 1960 Italian film “Mafioso” (sp?). What an absolutely amazing film. I could write a book about it. It had English subtitles, what I wouldn’t have given to understand the Italian (or Sicilian as the case may be). Best Tom Verso
Glad you agree, Tom.
Glad you agree, Tom. Cinematic representation of organized crime certainly is complex and full of ambiguity and contradiction. Yes, "Mafioso" with the great Alberto Sordi is an amazing film that seems to have found a new audience since its recent theatrical and DVD release. Its theme also finds an echo in both Gomorra and Le Conseguenze dell'amore -- once you are involved with, and indebted to, the Mafia or a camorra boss, there's no way out. They own you.
GdS
Film and Reality
What is often presented as a great paradox in Plato’s philosophy is the fact that he was a great poet, and yet in his idealized state The Republic he banished the “poets and tragedians.” However, there is no contradiction because he was a philosopher bent on truth first, and then a poet. Accordingly, he would banished the literary artist because he felt that they misrepresent reality, i.e. truth. In my opinion, those who see film in sociological/historical terms, i.e. mirrors of social realities, should keep Plato in mind. Artist may at best render aspects of complex social phenomena; however, they cannot grasp them in their sociological and historical totality.
The biography of Sammy (the Bull) Gravano, the New York Mafia gangster, develops the theme of the changing and degenerating nature of the American Mafia. Gravano depicts a very Godfatheresque mafia when he was a boy in New York. His father says to him: “They (i.e. Mafia gangsters) are not hardworking, nice people. They’re bad people, but they’re our bad people.” His father went on to tell Sammy “these men have ties to the community…there was a lot of prejudice against the Italian people when they first came over here, especially from the Irish cops and politicians, and the Italians went to these men to resolve their problems when the police wouldn’t do nothing…[For example], when two Irish “goons” came into his father’s business and demand payoffs “Or Else!”, his father went “to talk to Zuvito about it.” The next day the two "goons” came back and said: “Hey Gerry why didn’t you tell us Zuvito is your ‘compare’? We’re sorry. We apologize…Don’t forget, Gerry. Please tell Zuvito we were here, that we apologized.” Gravano goes on in the book to describe the degeneration of the mafia from a complex system of criminality and social justice to a base totally immoral organization (“the cash nexus is everything”) that he himself was instrumental in destroying. The history of the Camorra and Mafia from the post Risorgimento Brigandage in Southern Italy and Sicily through twentieth century American gangsterism is an extremely complex social history which manifests many moral perspectives: the bad, the good, and the ambiguous. To say that one artist has depicted ‘the truth’ and another has not is to ignore the “reality” of this moral complexity. It may be that Garrone ‘sees’ what Gravano saw in late 20th century American Mafia. And, it may be that Coppola saw what Gravano’s father saw in early 20th century American Mafia. Most importantly, according to Plato, all viewers must be on guard that both, being of the class ‘poets and tragedians’, are not rendering reality at all. Trying to reconstruct contemporary reality based on films is analogous to reconstructing Medieval reality based on tapestries. Neither film nor tapestry is to be ignored. But, they must be critiqued - taken with the proverbial “grain of salt.” Tom Verso
Grazie!
Ciao Maria. Grazie mille for the compliments, not only about the Gomorra review but also about my contributions in general. Much appreciated. I've been enjoying your work , too. By the way, "mooshamoosh" is one of my dad's favorite expressions.
GdS
Gomorra
Thanks, George, for this thoughtful review of "Gomorra" and your insightful comments on the terrifying reality of how organized crime has shaped the social and economic landscape of southern Italy. Your blogs -- whether sharing the work of Italian musicians appearing at Joe's Pub or critiquing current films -- are always illuminating. (And as someone who walked out of the movie "Crash" because I could no longer sit through its obvious, cloying story line, I appreciate your aside!) --Maria Laurino